Forecast of heavy rainfall in West of Iran According to Weather Radar Estimates Using the Z-R method

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Ph.D student of Climatology, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Climatology, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran

3 Professor of Climatology, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

The amount of precipitation measured by the radar is different from the amount of precipitation received on the ground. This difference has many causes, some of which are related to the nature of the radar and others to the climate of each region. As a result, radar data needs to be corrected for radar data based on terrestrial data to determine the amount of ground-level rainfall received from the radar data. Weather radar used for estimation of rain in the large areas. The relationship between rain and reflectivity radar is exponential Z = aRb. Radar estimated rainfall amount is incorrect if the coefficients of this model are wrong. Drop size and distribution of rainfall is Effective on the coefficient of this model. The change in the coefficients of this model is very high. In this study, to calibrate radar data, rain from 2 to 3 December 2016 and 11 to 13 February 2018 at the stations, Kermanshah, Eslamabad, Sarpol, Ghasre Shirin, Harsin, Javanroud, Tazabad, Songhor, Ravansar, Ghilan Gharb and Soumar at distance of 30 to 100 kilometers from Kermanshah’s radar are investigated. In the first rain, using soft Rainbow for each of the stations and radar beam elevation angle optimization and correction factors relating to the extraction station, respectively. With this relationship, the radar rainfall estimates from 31 percent to 96 percent Increased and the average total rainfall from 8.9 to 32.4 millimeter increased an average radar rainfall estimated only 1 millimeter less than actual rain by gauge. In the second rain, using data from all stations, only one equation and correction factors were obtained. The results rainfall radar will be accepted at this stage, good approximation, and the average estimate rainfall radar from 9.6 to 23.5 millimeter increased those 4 millimeters less than the actual amount by gauge. If radar coefficients are corrected correctly for different areas, precipitation can be predicted and prevented from occurring unexpected events.

Keywords


References (in Persian)
Ghalhari Fallah, G., Kadkhoda, E., (2017), The Evaluation of the Spatial Structure of Mashhad Plain Precipitation in the Last Half-Century, Hydrogeomorphology, 3(11). 39-57. [In Persian]
Makvandi, H., (2010), Meteorological radar calibration using automatic rain gauge data to evaluate the precision of radar rainfall estimation, Master's Thesis, Supervisor: Dr. Mohammad Mousavi, Water Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. [In Persian]
Mohammadiha, A., Meamarian, M., Reyhani Parvari, M., (2013), Estimation of Tehran weather radar of precipitation quantity by Z-R method for three precipitation events of 2010 and 2011, Journal of Physics of Earth and Space, 3(2), 187-204. [In Persian]
Scolin, M. (2013), Introduction to radar system, Translation by Soheilifard, Mohammad Reza and Aghababaei Majid, Adabestan Publishing (Third edition). [In Persian]
Tufaninejad, Z., Kamali, G., Alizadeh, M., (2009), Application of X-ray meteorological radars in estimating rainfall in small basins, Water and Soil Journal, 23 (1), 67-57. [In Persian]
References (in English)
Amitai, E., Wolff, D.B., Marks, D.A., Silberstein, D.S., (2002), Radar rainfall estimation;lessons learned from the NASA / TRMM validation program, Proceedings of ERAD publication series, 1, 255-260.
Battan, L.J., (1973), Radar observation of the atmosphere. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 324.
Christodoulous. C. MichaelidesS M. G., (2004), Prediction of rainfall rate based on weather radar measurements. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37541).
Gunn, R. and Kinzer, G.D., (1949), The terminal velocity of fall for water droplets in stagnant air. J. Meteorol., 6, 243–248.
Hagen, M., Yuter, S., (2002), Relations between radar reflectivity, Liquid-water content, and rainfall rate durins the MAP SOP, J.R Meteoral, Sol, 129, 477-493.
Lee, G., Seed, A.W., Zawadzki, I., (2007), Modeling the variability of drop size distributions in space and time. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 46 (6), 742–756.
Lee, G., Zawadzki, I., (2005), Variability of drop size distributions: time-scale dependence of the variability and its effects on rain estimation. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 44(2), 241–255.
Lee.G.W., Zawadazki. I., (2004), Variability of drop size distribution: Noise and Noise filtering in disdrometric data; Journal of applied meteorology, 44, 634-652.
Marshall, J.S., Hitschfeld, W. and Gunn, K.L.S., (1955), Advances in radar weather. Adv. Geophys., 2, 1–56.
Overeem, A. Buishand, T. A. and Holleman, I., (2009), Extreme rainfall analysis and estimation of depth-duration-frequency using weather radar, Water Resources research, 45, 1-15.
Overeem, A., Holleman, I., Buishand, A., (2008), Derivation of a 10-Year Radar-Based Climatology of Rainfall, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. 48, 1448-1463.
Pedersen, l., Jensen, N.E., Madsen, H., (2010), Calibration of Local Area Weather Radar—Identifying significant factors affecting the calibration; Atmospheric Research, 97,129–143.
Smith, J.A., Krajewski, W.F., (2002), Radar hydrology: rainfall estimation. Advance in water Resources, 25, 1387-1394.
Tokay, A., Hartmann. P, Battaglia. A., (2008), A Field Study of Reflectivity and Z–R Relations Using Vertically Pointing Radars and Disdrometers, Journal of Atmosphric and Oceanic Technology, 26,1120-1134.
Uijlenhoet, R., (2001), Raindrop size and radar reflectivity – rain rate relationships for radar hydrology, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 5 (4), 615–627.
Uijlenhoet, R., Stricker, J. N. M., (1999), Dependence of rainfall on drop size, J. of Hydrology, 217, 157-163.
Wang G., Liu L., Ding Y., (2012), Improvement of Radar Quantitative Precipitation Estimation Based on Real-Time Adjustments to Z-R Relationships and Inverse Distance Weighting Correction Schemes, Advancesin Atmospheric, 29(3), 575-584.
Volume 8, Issue 22 - Serial Number 4
December 2020
Pages 59-74
  • Receive Date: 03 May 2018
  • Revise Date: 13 October 2018
  • Accept Date: 15 December 2018
  • First Publish Date: 22 December 2019
  • Publish Date: 22 December 2019