Environmental Impact Assessment of Yasuj Cement Factory Using Iranian RIAM and Leopold Matrix (Case Study: Tangary Village of Yasouj City)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Geography and Rural Planning, Mohaghegh Ardebili University, Ardebil, Iran

2 PhD Student of Geography and Urban Planning, Azad University, Ardebil, Iran

3 MA Student of Geography and Rural Planning, Mohaghegh Ardebili University, Ardebil, Iran

Abstract

Today, the path to sustainable development is to pay attention to the industries that, while maintaining the principles of the environment, while maintaining the principles of the environment, improve the lives of the people of society and do not pose serious risks for the future generation. In this regard, the environmental impact assessment Is an appropriate tool for achieving sustainable development goals that identify and predicts the environmental impacts of a project or different projects on the environmental components (physical, biological, socio-economic, and cultural). The purpose of this study was to identify and predict the effects of construction of yasuj cement factory in the city of Yasuj. In this descriptive-analytical study, the present state of the environment in the region was studied. Then, by reviewing the project's technical resources, we aimed to identify the most important phases of exploitation and construction. Finally, the Iranian Leopold Matrix method and RIAM were selected to evaluate the environmental impacts of the Yaman-e-Jam Cement factory. The results of the RIAM matrix analysis showed that the most negative effects were related to air quality, soil erosion, noise pollution, quality of agricultural products, landscapes and landscapes of the village, employment and unemployment, and in contrast to the positive the most significant impacts of rural development plans, services and transportation are property values. Therefore, the implementation of the project has many socio-economic benefits for the village and surrounding areas. Also according to the results of the Leopold matrix, the most environmental damage involved in the exploitation phase is related to the socioeconomic and cultural sectors and in the biological and physical building stage, therefore, since the most negative effects created in the classification of the weak group the project was fully approved. But corrective actions must be taken into consideration until the environmental effects of the plant increase.

Keywords


References (in Persian)
panahandeh, Mohammad; Niloufar Abedinzadeh, Mohammad Ravanbakhsh. 2010, Environmental Impact Assessment of Yazd Compost Plant, Environmental Sciences and Technology, 12th Period, No. 3. P.99-87.
Heidari, Elham Sadat; Hossein Alidadi, Maryam Sarkhosh, Somayeh Sadeghian, 1396, Environmental Impact Assessment of Zavweh Cement Factory Using Iranian Leopold Matrix, Journal of Environmental Health Research, No. 3, pp. 84-93.
Makhdoom, Majid, 1361, Model of environmental assessment, ecology, Volume 11, Issue 11, pp. 34-25.
Salman Mahini, Abdolrasoul; Nematollah Khorasani, Reza Rafiei, 2009, Environmental Assessment of Life Cycle of Urban Management System (Case Study of Mashhad), Journal of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources, Volume 16, Special Issue 2, pp. 220-208.
Shokouhian, Mohammad; Ehsan Rahimi, Nasir Khoshir Al-Saidi, Zahra al-Miahi, 1396, Environmental Impact Assessment in the Cement Factory Operation Period by Iranian Matrix Method, Study of Man, Cain Cain, International Conference on Modern Research in Civil Engineering, Architecture , Urban and Environmental Management, pp. 21-1.
Abedinizadeh, Niloufar; Makhram Ravanbakhsh, Tobe Abedi, 2013; Environmental Impact Assessment of Sanitary Landfill - Urban Waste Management in Semnan, Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 15, No. 2, Page 105-117.
Abbasi, Mohammad; Hamid Balidie, 1393, Environmental Impact Assessment Using Iranian Matrix Method, Case Study: Sarouj Cement Factory, First National Conference on Environment, Payame Noor University, COI Code: ISFPNU01_249.
Omrani, Ghasem-Ali, Naghmeh Alavi Nakhjavani, 2009, Solid Waste Management, Andisheh Rafi Publication, p. 124.
Environmental Protection Agency. 1390 Secretariat of the Environmental Assessment Committee, Environmental Assessment Reports.
Ghahamali Fard, Mehdi, Masoud Hatamiyamanesh, Alireza Riahi Bakhtiyari, Mehraban Sadeghi, 2014, Application of the Rapid Impact Assessment and Matrix Evaluation Matrix (Leopold Modified) in Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Solid Waste Landfill Shahrekord, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences Journal, Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 31-46.
Civic, Sajedeh; Saeed Malmasi, Roya Nazakati Esmailzadeh, 1396, Environmental Impact Assessment of Steel Mills Using Modified RIAM Case Study of Tiam Steel in Guilan Province, Environmental Science and Technology, Nineteenth, Special Issue No. 4, p. 421 -409.
Manouri, Masoud (2005), Environmental Impact Assessment, Tehran, Mitra Publishing House, p. 3.
Mirzai, System; Jafar Noori, Amir Hossein Mahvi, Masoud Younesian, Afshin Maleki, 2009, Environmental Impact Assessment of Sanandaj Compost Plant, Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Fourteenth, pp. 79-88.
Mirzaii, Mojgan, Abdolrasoul Salman Mahini, Seyyed Mohammad Mirkarimi, Hossein Moradi, 1392, Application of Mathematical Matrix in Evaluation of the Effects of the Development of the Composting Plant, Case Study: Golpayegan Compost Plant, Environmental Studies, Vol. 4, Vol. 8, pp. 130-117.
Nasrollahi, Zahra; Marzieh Ghaffari Goolak, 2010, Air Pollution and Effective Factors on the Case Study of SPM, SO2 Production in Iran's Manufacturing Industries, Economic Quarterly Journal of the 10th Year, No. 3, pp. 75-95.
Nawaee Feizabadi, Ali Asghar, Hossein Alidadi, Ali Nasifefour, Mohsen Dankoub, Mohsen Yazdani, Masoumeh Saghi, Mohammad Nasr Shafie, 1395, Environmental Impact Assessment of Composting Plants in Iran, Environmental Health Research, Period 2, No. 1, pp. 51-38.
Valizadeh, Soheil, Zainab Shokri, 1394, Application of Iranian Leopold Matrix in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of solid waste management options in Birjand city, Journal of Environmental Health, Quarterly Journal of Environmental Health Association of Iran, Vol. 8 , No. 2, pp. 249-262.
References (in English)
Aranda, U. A., Lopez Sabiron, A.M., Ferreira. G, Llera Sastresa, E ( 2013), Uses of alternative fuels and raw materials in the cement industry as sustainable waste management options,  Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. No 23, pp242-260.
El-Naqa, A (2005), Environmental impact assessment using rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM) for Russeifa landfill, Jordan. Environ Geol; 47(5):Pp 632-639.
Kuitunen, M., Jalava, K., Hirvonen, K (2008), Testing the usability of the Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM) method for comparison of EIA and SEA results. Environmental Impact Assessment Review;28(4):312-320.
Makhdum M (2009), Four notes is assessing the developing impact. Environment and Development;2(3):9-12.
Mondal. M., Rashmi. K., Dasgupta, B. V (2010), EIA of municipal solid waste disposal site in Varanasi using RIAM analysis. J Resources, Conservation and Recycling,; 54(9): 541-546.
Muntean, O.L., Dragut, L., Baciu, N., Man, T., Buzila, L., Ferencik, I (2007), Environmental impact assessment as a tool for environmental restoration, a case study: Copsa-Mica area, Romania, Use of Landscape Sciences for the Assessment of Environmental Security, pp. 461-474. Springer, (URL: http://www. springerlink.com/ content/w44193745m67q613/).
Pastakia, C. M. R., Jensen A (1998),The rapid impact assessment matrix (Riam) For eia. J EnvironImpact Asses;18(5): Pp 461-82.
Shoili AG, Farrokhi M, Alizadeh H (2000), Selection of optimum option for sludge disposal in the Guilan province of Iran using rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM). J Water Resources and Environ Eng; 3(12): 288-97.
Suthar, S., Sajwan, A (2014), Rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM) analysis as decision tool to select new site for municipal solid waste disposal: A case study of Dehradun city India,Original Research Article,V 13: Pp 12-19.
Volume 8, Issue 21 - Serial Number 3
September 2019
Pages 247-266
  • Receive Date: 15 October 2018
  • Revise Date: 18 November 2018
  • Accept Date: 27 January 2019
  • First Publish Date: 23 September 2019
  • Publish Date: 23 September 2019