Seismic hazard analysis and zoning of Hashtgerd area

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Assistant professor, Department of geology, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

2 Assistant professor, Department of geology, Karaj branch, Islamic azad University, Karaj, Iran

3 Master of Science Student of Engineering Geology, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

The geological position and faults of Iran have caused earthquakes in the country throughout history. Assessing the seismic hazard of Tehran as the capital and its suburbs due to direct impact on the city of Tehran is very important from the viewpoint of earthquakes and the risks and possible damage caused by possible earthquakes to rehabilitate the more dangerous and vulnerable areas, as well as the creation of suitable facilities for the time of crisis... The hashtgerd range has high seismic activity due to its geographic proximity to Tehran. This is due to the construction of Hashtgerd new town, which has caused the extraordinary increase of human and urban densities in recent years to reduce the need of the region for more accurate and more rigorous surveying of seismicity. Risks make it special. In this research, using the conventional method of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, the study area is located at 250 km radius of seismic studies and the estimated seismic riskiness of the area was estimated by analyzing the results. According to the study, the north and east of the region have higher fault densities. Also, according to the iso-acceleration map for a return period of 475 years, the maximum values are in the northern and northeastern strips as discrete zones and also in the southwest of Hashtgerd city in Najmabad area. The southern margin of the Alborz province generally has relatively less accelerated areas. The Hashtgerd city in the high danger zone ranges from 0.38 g to 46 g. Also, the map for the return period of 2475 years indicates that the maximum values are in the south of Hashtgerd, and Hashtgerd is in the range with an acceleration range greater than 0.68-0.85g.

Keywords


References (in Persian)
Alimardan, S., Solaymani Azad, Sh., Ghorashi, M., Ghassemi, M.R., Oveisi, B. and Hatami, A. (2015), Morphotectonic Markers and Active Faulting Research In Hashtgerd New Town, West of Karaj. Scientific Quarterly Journal, GEOSCIENCES. 24(94). 227-234. [in Persian].
Berberian, M., Qorshi, M., Arzhang Ravesh, B., & MohajeraShjaiy, A., (1985), Research and development of neo tectonic , seismotectonic and earthquake hazard -fault in the vicinity of Tehran and the surrounding area, Geological Survey and Mineral Exploration, Report 56, Part 10. [in Persian].
Jafarian, M., Goodarzi, A., Pirhadi, G., Parto azar, H. and Abdolahi, M. (2013) Geological map report 1: 25000 Hashtgerd, Geological Survey of Iran. [in Persian].
Mahmoodpoor, M., Bloorchi, J. and Entezam soltani, E. (2014), Hashtgerd Engineering Geology map Scale 1: 25000, Geological Survey of Iran. [in Persian].
Mir Mohammad Hosseini, S. M., Arefpour, Babak., (2008), Seismic Geotechnical Engineering, International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 962 pages
Pourkaramani, Mohsen., Arian, Mehran., (1997), Siomisotectonic, Alavi, First Printing, 284 pages
Zare, M., (2005), Basics of earthquake hazard analysis, International Institute of Seismology and Engineering Earthquake. [in Persian].
References (in English)
Ambraseys, N. N., (1974), Historical seismicity of Iran, in materials for the study of seismotectonics of Iran, North – Central Iran, Geol Survey, Iran.
 Ambraseys, N. N. & Melville, C. P., (1982),  A History of Persian Earthquakes, Cambridge University Press, 219.
 Berberian, M., (1977), Macro seismic epicenters of Iranian earthquake, Geological Survey Iran. 40, 279.
Boostan, E.,  Tahernia, N., & Shafiee, A., (2015), Fuzzy—probabilistic seismic hazard assessment, case study: Tehran region, Iran, Natural Hazards, 77( 2), 525-541
Campbell, K.W., & Bozorgnia, Y., (2003), Updated near-source ground-motion (attenuation) relations for the horizontal         and vertical components of peak ground acceleration and acceleration response spectra, B.S.S.A. 93[1], 314-331
 Campbell, K.W., and Bozorgnia, Y., (2008),  NGA Ground Motion Model for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% Damped Linear Elastic Response Spectra for Periods Ranging from 0.01 to 10, Journal of Earthquake Spectra, 24[1]
Cornel, C. H., (1968). Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 54
Ghodrati Amiri, G., Μotammed, R., &  Rabet Eshaghi, H., (2003), Seismic hazard assessment of metropolitan Tehran, Iran, J. Earthquake Engineering, 7, 347-372.
   Kijko, A., & Sellevoll, Μ. A., (1992), Estimation of earthquake hazard  parameters from incomplete data files, Part II, incorporation of magnitude heterogeneity, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 82, 120-134.
  139-171
Schwartz, D. P., & Coppersmith, K. J., (1984), Fault   behavior and characteristic earthquakes: Examples from the Wasatch and San Andreas Fault Zones, Journal of Geophysical research. doi: 10.1029/JB089iB07p05681. issn: 0148-0227.
   Wells, D.L., and Coppersmith, K.J., (1994), New empirical   relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area and surface displacement, B.S.S.A. 84[4], 974-1002
 Wilson, A. T., (1930), Earthquakes in persian, Bull. School Oriental Stud. London. 6[1], 103-131
Volume 8, Issue 21 - Serial Number 3
September 2019
Pages 231-246
  • Receive Date: 25 August 2018
  • Revise Date: 20 November 2018
  • Accept Date: 10 March 2019
  • First Publish Date: 23 September 2019
  • Publish Date: 23 September 2019