Assessment of spatial distribution of flood generation hotspots in the Ramian’s Ghoorchay watershed using KINEROS2 model

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor., Watershed Management Department, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran.

2 MSc Student, Watershed Management Department, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Arid Zone Management Department, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran.

Abstract

Considering the ability for spatial quantification of various hydrological components, the distributed modeling of rainfall-runoff processes across the watersheds plays a key role in terms of water resources management, river engineering, flood control, and storage facilities as well as simulation of different watershed management scenarios. To this end, the Kinematic Runoff and erosion model, KINEROS2, has been used to assess the spatial distribution of rainfall-runoff processes components for the identification of surface runoff and flood generation hotspots across the Ramian’s Goorchay watershed with an area of about 254 km2 in the east of the Golestan Province. For evaluation of the model performance, 6 recorded rainfall-runoff events in the watershed were selected and divided into two sets of 3 events. The first set was used to run and calibrate the model and the second set was used to validate the model results. The mainland use types of the watershed are the Hyrcanian lush forest and rainfed agriculture on sloping lands. The rainfall-runoff simulations were carried out on an hourly basis.  The results of the performance evaluation of the model indicated that the KINEROS2 model is good enough at simulating the hydrological components of peak discharge and time to peak of flood hydrographs. However, it rarely performs well at simulating flood volume. The spatially distributed simulated map of surface runoff depth shows that various locations of the watershed have different flood generation potential. Whereas, the middle section of the watershed, where extensive land use change from forest to agriculture has occurred, shows high flood generation hazard potential, while the upstream section of the watershed displays lower flood generation potential despite having steep slopes.

Keywords


References (in Persian)
Aghaey Daneshvar, F., &  Khanjani, M.J., (2005), KINEROS2 model structure for estimation of runoff and sediment in a river basin. Proceedings of 2nd National Conference on Watershed Management and Soil and Water Management, March 2006, Kerman, Iran, p. 8. [In Persian]
Aghaey Daneshvar, F., & Khanjani, M.J., (2007), Prediction and estimation of peak discharge and sediment load across the Kerman’s Cheshmeh-Aroos watershed applying KINEROS2 model within AGWA tool, Proceedings of 9th National Seminar on Irrigation and Evaporation Reduction, February 2007, Kerman, Iran, p.143. [In Persian]
Golestan Natural Resources and Watershed Management Directorate, (2010), Detailed Watershed Management Plan for Ramian watershed, Hydrology Report, pp.21- 40. [In Persian]
Golestan Province Sazab Consulting Engineers, (2016), A review and survey on effects of Integrated Flood Plan and development of long term flood management in Golestan Province, pp.102. [In Persian]
Izadi, S., Jafarpour, Z., & Qaderi, H., (2011), Geomorphological analysis of flood in downstream of Kor river with emphasis on flood management. Geography, 5(16), pp.83 -96. [In Persian]
Javidan, N., & Bahremand, A., (2016), Separate components of the flood flow using the distributed hydrological WetSpa model in Ziarat-Gorgan watershed, J. of Water and Soil Conservation, 22(5), pp. 233 – 246. [In Persian]
Kamangar, K., (2012), Effect of rainfall scenarios on flood hydrograph using Geomorphologic Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph (Case study: Jafar-Abad watershed, Gorga, Golestan Province). MSc thesis, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 91 p. [In Persian]   
Namavar, B., (2011), Runoff prediction in the Kameh watershed applying KINEROS2 model using AGWA-GIS tool. MSc. Thesis in Drainage Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University, 85 p. [In Persian]
Naserabadi, F., Esmali Ouri, A., Akbari, H., & Rostamian, R., (2014), A sensitivity analysis of SWAT model in Ghareh Su watershed, Ardabil, Watershed Engineering and Management, 5(4), pp.255 – 265. [In Persian]
Mazidi, A., & Kooshki, S., (2015), Simulation of Rainfall-Runoff Process and Estimate of Flood with HEC-HMSModel in Khorramabad Catchment Area, Geography and Development, 13(41), pp. 1 – 10. [In Persian]
Memarian, H., Pourreza Bilondi, M., & Koumeh, Z., (2018). Parameters optimization of KINEROS using Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm for single event rainfall-runoff simulation (Case study: Tamar watershed, Golestan, Iran),  Journal of Watershed Management Research, 10(18), 91-110. [In Persian]
Mirzaei, S., Esmali Ouri, A., Mostafazadeh, R., Ghorbani, A., & Mirzaei, S., (2019), Flow modeling and determination of sub-watersheds contribution in flood hydrograph in Amoughin watershed, Ardabil province, Journal of Natural Environmental Hazards, 7(18), pp. 89 – 108. [In Persian]
Mollaeifar, I., (2013), Performance evaluation of the KINEROS2 model for simulation of flood hydrograph in the Ziarat watershed. MSc. Thesis in Watershed Management Engineering, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran, 80 p. [In Persian]
Mollaeifar, I., Sheikh, V.B., Bahremand, A.R., & Faramarzi, H., (2018). Performance evaluation of the KINEROS2 model for simulation of flood hydrograph (Case study: the Ziarat watershed), Journal of Natural Ecosystems of Iran, 9(3), 33- 54.  [In Persian]
Rezazadeh, M.S., Ganjalikhan, M., & Zounemat-Kermani, M., (2015), Comparing the performance of semi-distributed SWAT and lumped HEC-HMS hydrological models in simulating river discharge (Case study: Ab-Bakhsha Watershed), Ecohydrology, 2(4), pp. 467 – 479. [In Persian]
Salmani, H., Mohseni Saravi, M., Rouhani, H., & Salajeghe, A., (2012), Evaluation of Land Use Change and its Impact on the Hydrological Process in the Ghazaghli Watershed, Golestan Province, Watershed Management Research, 3(6), 43 – 60. [In Persian]
 
References (in English)
Al-Qurashi, A., McIntyre, N., Wheater, H., & Unrich, C., (2008), Application of the KINEROS2 rainfall-runoff model to an arid catchment in Oman. Journal of Hydrology. 355, 91-105.
An, M., Han, Y., Xu, L., Wang, X., & Pang, D., (2019). KINEROS2-based simulation of total nitrogen loss on slopes under rainfall events. CATENA, 17, 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.01.039.
Feyereisen, G.W., Strickland, T.C., Bosch, D.D., & Sullivan, D.G., (2007), Evaluation of SWAT manual calibration and input parameter sensitivity in the little river watershed. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 50(3), 843-855.
Hantush, M., & Kalin, L., (2005), Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of runoff and sediment yield in a small agricultural watershed with KINEROS2. Journal – des Science Hydrologiques, 50(6), 1151.
Jha, M.K., Gassman, P.W., & Arnold, J.G., (2007), Water quality modeling for the Raccoon River watershed, using SWAT. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 50(2), 479−49.
Korgaonkar, Y., Guertin, D. P., Goodrich, D. C., Unkrich, C., Kepner, W. G., & Burns, I. S., (2018). Modeling urban hydrology and green infrastructure using the AGWA urban tool and the KINEROS2 model. Frontiers in Built Environment, 4. Doi:10.3389/fbuil.2018.00058
Memarian, H., Balasundram, S.K., Talib, J.B., Sung, C.T.B., Sood, M.A., & Abbaspour, K.C., (2013), KINEROS2 application for land-use cover change impact analysis at the Hulu Langat Basin, Malaysia. Water and Environment Journal, 27, 549-560. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12002.
Parlange, J.Y., Lisle, I., Braddock, R.D., & Smith, R.E., (1982), The three-parameters infiltration equation. Soil Science. 133(6), 337-41.
Rawls, W.J., Brakensiek, D.L., & Saxton, K.E., (1982), Estimation of soil water properties. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 25(5), 1316-1320.
Safari, A.R., Smedt, F., & Moreda, F., (2012), WetSpa model application in the Distributed Model Intercomparison Project (DMIP2). Journal of Hydrology, 418, 78-89.
Semmens, D.J., Goodrich, D.C., Unkrich, C.L., & Smith, R.E., (2004), KINEROS2 modeling framework, Agricultural Research Service, ARS-77, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Tucson, Arizona.
Sheikh, V., van Loon, E.E., Hessel, R., & Jetten, V., (2010), Sensitivity of LISEM predicted catchment discharge to initial soil moisture content of soil profile, Journal of Hydrology, 393,174 - 185
Smith, R.E., Goodrich, D.C., & Quinton, J., (1995), Dynamic, distributed simulation of watershed erosion: the KINEROS2 and EUROSEM models. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 50(5), 517-20.
Smith, R.E., Goodrich, D.C., & Unkrich, C. L., (1999), Simulation of selected events on the Clatsop catchment by KINEROS2. A report for the GCTE conference on catchment-scale erosion models. Catena, 37, 457-574.
White, K.L., & Chaubey, I., (2005), Sensitivity analysis, calibration, and validation for a malt sit and multivariable SWAT model. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 41(5), 1077- 1089.
Woolhiser, D.A., Hanson, C.L., & Kuhlman, A.R., (1970), Overland flow on rangeland watersheds. Journal of Hydrology. 9(2), 336-56.
Zhang, X., Liao, C., Li, J., & Sun, Q., (2013), Fractional vegetation cover estimation in arid and semi-arid environments using HJ-1 satellite hyperspectral data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 21, 506 – 512. DOI:10.1016/j.jag.2012.07.003c
Ziegler, A.D., Giambelluca, T.W., & Sutherland, R. A., (2001), Erosion prediction on unpaved mountain roads in northern Thailand. Validation of dynamic erodibility modeling using KINEROS2. Hydrological Processes, 15, 337-358.
Zouheira, I.A., Lajili, L., & Zairi, M., (2015), Rainfall-runoff modeling for predictive infiltration and recharge areas for water management in the semi-arid basin: a case study from Saadine watershed, Tunisia. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 9(1), pp. 19. DOI:10.1007/s12517-015-2049-3.
Volume 9, Issue 26 - Serial Number 4
December 2021
Pages 21-42
  • Receive Date: 06 October 2019
  • Revise Date: 17 April 2020
  • Accept Date: 01 August 2020
  • First Publish Date: 21 December 2020
  • Publish Date: 21 December 2020