Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Using DRASTIC and SINTACS Models in GIS (Case Study: Karun Township)

Amanpour, Saeid; Abiyat, Mahmud; Abiyat, Mohammad

doi:10.22111/jneh.2020.34262.1668

Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Using DRASTIC and SINTACS Models in GIS (Case Study: Karun Township)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

¹ Associate Professor, Geography &Urban Planning, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran.

² MSc., Geography &Rural Planning, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran.

³ Msc., Natural Resources Engineering, Environment (Land Use Planning and Assessment), Islamic Azad, Science and Research Tehran (Khouzestan), Iran.

10.22111/jneh.2020.34262.1668

Abstract

Existence of important sources of pollutants and points of human activities on the ground and the penetration of these pollutants into aquifers, reduces the quality of groundwater, so in the management of groundwater resources, pollution prevention these waters are essential. The groundwater of Karun Township in Khuzestan province is always exposed to pollution due to the prosperity of agricultural and industrial activities in that area. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate and zoning the aquifer vulnerability of the region using DRASTIC and SINTACS models. By mapping and combining hydrogeological parameters effective in the transfer of contamination to the aquifer, vulnerability maps of the two models were prepared in GIS software environment. To validate the models used, the measured amounts of nitrate in the wells in the area were used and the Pearson correlation coefficient between the models and the nitrate layer was calculated and determined. The results showed that the vulnerability index of the DRASTIC model varies Between 68 to 215 and the vulnerability index of the SINTACS model varies between 52 and 195. In the DRASTIC method, 485.2 hectares of the area without risk of pollution, 751.6 hectares with very low vulnerability, 3305.5 hectares with low vulnerability, 12411.7 hectares with moderate vulnerability, 11191.2 hectares with Moderate to high vulnerability, 9427.3 hectares with high vulnerability, 58861 hectares with very high vulnerability and 478.5 hectares are completely susceptible to infection. In the SINTACS method, 455.4 hectares of the area without risk of pollution, 789.1 hectares with very low vulnerability, 32281 hectares with low vulnerability, 12426.7 hectares with medium vulnerability, 11169.4 hectares with Moderate to high vulnerability, 9449.3 hectares with high vulnerability, 5844.2 hectares with very high vulnerability and 495.7 hectares are completely susceptible to infection. Also, the correlation of groundwater nitrate map with DRASTIC and SINTACS models was 0.68 and 0.51, respectively, which indicates the higher capability of the DRASTIC model than the SINTACS model for the aquifer in the study area.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Environmental Contamination

References

References (in Persian)

Asghari Moghaddam, A., Fijani, E., Nadiri, A., (2010), Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Using GIS-Based DRASTIC Model in the Bazargan and Poldasht Plains, Journal of Environmental Studies, 35(52), 55-64. [In Persian]

Asghari Moghaddam, A., Adigozalpour, A., Mohammady, A., (2018), Vulnerability Assessment of Oshnavieh Plain Aquifer by SINTACS and DRASTIC Models, Journal of Natural Environmental Hazards, 7(17), 99-120. [In Persian]

Entezari, M., Amiri, F., Tabatabaie, T., (2018), A GIS, DRASTIC Techniques for Assessing Groundwater Vulnerability in Torghabeh–Shandiz Watershed of Khorasan County, Journal of RS and GIS for Natural Resources, 9(3), 19-32. [In Persian]

Mahmoudzadeh, E., Rezaian, S., & Ahmadi, A. (2013). Assessment of Meymeh Plain Aquifer Vulnerability in Esfahan Using Comparative Method AVI, GODS, DRASTIC. Journal of Environmental Studies, 39(2), 45-60 [In Persian]

Mousavi, F., Yaghoubi, M., Chitsazan, M., (2016). Land Use Management by Assessing Aquifer Vulnerability in Khovayes Plain Using the DRASTIC and SINTACS Models, Journal of Water and Wastewater, 27(3), 88-92. [In Persian]

Nadiri, A.A., Sedghee, Z., (2020), Evaluation of multiple aquifer vulnerability using DRASTIC, SINTACS methods, Journal of Hydrogeology, 4(2), 171-186. [In Persian]

Parizadi, T., Rowshangar, S., (2012), Application of Geographic Information System (GIS) in Urban Planning, Journal of Geographical Data (SEPEHR), 21(83), 51-57. [In Persian]

Zehtabian, G., Sadeghi Ravesh, M.H., (2012), Assessing the Vulnerability of Khezrabad Plain Aquifer by DRASTIC Method, Journal of Environmental Studies & Bioengineering, 55, 21-31. [In Persian]

References (in English)

Aller, L., Bennet, T., lEHER, J.H., Petty, R.J., & Hackett, G. (1987). DRASTIC: Astandardized System for Evaluating Ground Water Pollution Potential Using Geohydrogeologic Settings. E.P.A., Report, No. 600/2-87-035: 622p.

Al kuisi, M., El-Naqa, A., & Hmmouri, N. (2006). Vulnerability Mapping of Shallow Groundwater Aquifer Using SINTACS Model in the Jordan Valley Area, Jordan. Environmental Geology, 50, 651–667.

Almasri, M.N. (2008). Assessment of Intrinsic Vulnerability to Contamination for Gaza Coastal Aquifer, Palestine. Journal of Environmental Management, 88(4), 577-593.

Antonakos, A.K., & Lambrakis, N.J. (2007). Development and Testing of Three Hybrid Methods for the Assessment of Aquifer Vulnerability to Nitrates, Based on the Drastic Model, an Example from NE Korinthia, Greece. Journal of Hydrology, 333(2-4), 288– 304.

Civita, M., (1990), Legenda unificata per le Carte della vulnerabilita dei corpi idrici sotterranei/ Unified legend for the aquifer pollution vulnerability Maps, Studi sulla Vulnerabilita degli Acquiferi. Pitagora Edit, Bologna.

Dixon, B. (2005). Groundwater Vulnerability Mapping: A GIS and Fuzzy Rule Based Integrated Tool. Applied Geography, 25(4), 327-347.

El–Naqa, A., Hammouri, N., & Kioso, M. (2006). GIS–based Evaluation of Groundwater Vulnerability in the Russeifa Area, Jordan. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, 23(3), 277–287.

Gogu, R.C., & Dassargues, A. (2000). Current Trends in Vulnerability Assessment Using Overlay and Index Methods. Environment Geology, 39(6), 549-559.

Hamza, M.H., Added, A., Rodrı guez, R., Abdeljaoued, S., & Ben Mammou, A. (2007). GIS-based DRASTIC Vulnerability and Net Recharge Reassessment in an Aquifer of a Semi-Arid Region (Metline-Ras Jebel-Raf Raf aquifer, Northern Tunisia). Journal of Environmental Management, 84(1), 493-505.

Katta, B., Walid, A.F., & Al Charideh, A.R. (2010). Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment for the Bunyas Catchment of the Syrian Coastal Area Using GIS and the RISK Method. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(5), 1103-1110.

Nobre, R.C.M., Rotunno Filho, O.C., Mansur, W.J., Nober, M.M.M., & Cosenza, C.A.N. (2007). Groundwater Vulnerability and Risk Mapping Using GIS, Modeling and a Fuzzy Logic Tool. Journal of Contamination Hydrology, 94(2007), 277-292.

Panagopoulos, G., Antonakos, A., Lambrakis, N., (2006), Optimization of DRASTIC model for groundwater vulnerability assessment, by the use of simple statistical methods and GIS. Hydrogeology Journal. 14:894-911.

Rosen, L. (1994). A Study of the DRASTIC Methodology with Emphasis on Swedish Conditions. Groundwater, 32(2), 278-285

Thapinta, A., & Hudak, P. (2003). Use of Geographic Information Systems for Assessing Groundwater Pollution Potential by Pesticides in Central Thailand. Environment International, 29(1), 87–93.

Voudouris, K., Kazakis, N., Polemio, M., & Kareklas, K. (2010). Assessment of Intrinsic Vulnerability Using the DRASTIC Model and GIS in the Kiti Aquifer, Cyprus. European Water, 30, 13-24.

WHO. (2004). Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality. Recommendations, Geneva: World Health Organization, 9, 21-29.