Analyzing Biodiversity Management Challenges in the Sorkhabad Protected  Area of the Zanjan Province, using a Grounded Theory  study

Safarialamouti, Parvaneh; Karamidehkordi, Esmail; Aazami, Jaber

doi:10.22111/jneh.2021.36603.1730

Analyzing Biodiversity Management Challenges in the Sorkhabad Protected Area of the Zanjan Province, using a Grounded Theory study

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

¹ PhD Student of Agricultural Development, Communication and Rural Development Department, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Iran

² Associate Professor, Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran

³ Assistant Professor, Environmental Sciences Department, Faculty of Science, University of Zanjan, Iran

10.22111/jneh.2021.36603.1730

Abstract

Biodiversity faces various challenges which make its management difficult. This research aimed to investigate the challenges of biodiversity management in the Sorkhabad Protected Area of the Zanjan Province. The research was conducted using a qualitative approach through the grounded theory methodology. A sample of participants consisting of 15 experts from the Environmental Protection Administration and the Natural Resources and Watershed Management Administration in the Zanjan Province were selected through a theoretical and snowball sampling and the data were collected by semi-structured interviews. Using the Nvivo10 software, the data on biodiversity management challenges were analyzed through open coding, axial coding, and selective coding, which led to exploring 92 concepts, 38 initial categories, 22 principal categories, and 9 core categories. Then, the relationship among the core categories was identified. It was identified that biodiversity loss is interconnected with other natural hazards and environmental crises. Moreover, the threat and loss of biodiversity and other natural resources are directly and indirectly influenced by various factors consisting of weak national strategies and policies on biodiversity management; the weakness of allocating human, financial and physical resources of organizations responsible for biodiversity protection; poor knowledge, attitude and value system of rural communities about biodiversity management; unsustainable agriculture and natural resources use by rural communities; unsustainable use and intervention of people outside rural communities; unsustainable actions of external organizations; and lack of integrated and participatory management in biodiversity management.

Keywords

20.1001.1.26764377.1401.11.33.4.5

Main Subjects

Environmental Hazards

References

References (in Persian)

Dabiri. F., Riyazi, B., Khorasani, N., Homayuni, M. (2010). Investigating some legal challenges of the four regions under the management of the environmental organization in Guilan province, Natural Resources Science and Technology, 5(3), pp 101-114. [In Persian]

Hajimirrahimi, S.D., Nabaee, S.M. (2007). A Survey on Challenges and problems of Natural Resources Development Methods in the Central Province. The new finding in Agriculture. 1(2), pp 161-176. [In Persian]

Islamic Parliament Research Center Of The Islamic Republic Of IRAN. (2019). Law on Environmental Protection and Improvement. Available in https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/92685 [In Persian]

Karamidehcordi, E., Mansori, N., Rahimian, J. (2017). Participation of Rural Communities in Decision Making, Monitoring, and Evaluation of the Oak Forest trees Dieback Management in the Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province. Forest and Range Protection Research. 15(2), pp 165-175. [In Persian]

Karimi, K., Karamidehcordi, E. (2017). Participation of Rural Users in Pasture Management Plans and the Factors Effective on them in Mahneshan Township. Geography And Development Iranian Journal. 14(45), pp 196-181. [In Persian]

Mahmoodi, J., Mirbozorgi, S.A., Heidari, Gh., Raayati, M. (2012). Indicators affecting grazing management project in Mazandaran rangelands from the perspective of natural resources experts, Natural Ecosystems of Iran, 2(3), pp 59-49. [In Persian]

Mohammadzadeh , A., basiri, R., Tarahi, A., Dadashian, R., elahiyan, M. (2015).Evaluation of biodiversity of plant species in Arasbaran area using non-parametric measures concerning topographic factor of slope: a case study of aquiferous land of Ilgina and Kaleibar rivers. Plant Research. 27(4), pp 728-741. [In Persian]

Nobakht, A.A., Hojjati, S.M., Pourmjidian, M.R., & Khorrami, R.A. (2018). Investigation on livestock presence in the forest on plant biodiversity and soil properties in Zalemroud, Neka, Mazandaran province. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 26(3), pp 382-392 [In Persian]

Zokaei, M. (2016). A Report on the State Iran’s Environment. Available in https://eform.doe.ir/Portal/Home/default.aspx [In Persian]

References (in English)

Augustine, D., Davidson, A., Dickinson, K., & Van Pelt, B. (2019). Thinking like a grassland: Challenges and opportunities for biodiversity conservation in the great plains of North America. Rangeland Ecology & Management. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2019.09.001

Bhandari, M. (2018). The problems and consequences of biodiversity conservation: A case study from Bangladesh, India, Nepal, and Pakistan. Socioeconomic Challenges, 2(1), 6-20.

Castro, A. J., Martín-López, B., García-Llorente, M., Aguilera, P. A., López, E., & Cabello, J. (2011). Social preferences regarding the delivery of ecosystem services in a semiarid mediterranean region. Journal of Arid Environments, 75(11), 1201-1208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.05.013

Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L. L. (2015). Grounded theory. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Christie, M., Fazey, I., Cooper, R., Hyde, T., & Kenter, J. O. (2012). An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies. Ecological Economics, 83, 67-78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.012

Conlon, C., Timonen, V., Elliott-O’Dare, C., O’Keeffe, S., & Foley, G. (2020). Confused about theoretical sampling? Engaging theoretical sampling in diverse grounded theory studies. Qualitative Health Research, 30(6), 947-959. doi:10.1177/1049732319899139

Crowder, D. W., & Jabbour, R. (2014). Relationships between biodiversity and biological control in agroecosystems: Current status and future challenges. Biological Control, 75, 8-17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.10.010

de Groot, R., Brander, L., van der Ploeg, S., Costanza, R., Bernard, F., Braat, L., . . . van Beukering, P. (2012). Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services, 1(1), 50-61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005

Díaz, S., Hector, A., & Wardle, D. A. (2009). Biodiversity in forest carbon sequestration initiatives: Not just a side benefit. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 1(1), 55-60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2009.08.001

Dikgang, J., & Muchapondwa, E. (2012). The valuation of biodiversity conservation by the South African Khomani San “bushmen” community. Ecological Economics, 84, 7-14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.001

Geisen, S., Wall, D. H., & van der Putten, W. H. (2019). Challenges and Opportunities for Soil Biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Current Biology, 29(19), R1036-R1044. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.007

Grooten, M., & Almond, R. E. A. E. (2018). Living Planet Report 2018: Aiming higher. Retrieved from Gland, Switzerland.

Hauck, J., Görg, C., Varjopuro, R., Ratamäki, O., & Jax, K. (2013). Benefits and limitations of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy and decision making: Some stakeholder perspectives. Environmental Science & Policy, 25, 13-21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.08.001

Hesselink, F., Goldstein, W., van Kempen, P., Garnett, T., & Dela, J. (2007). Communication, Education and Public Awareness (CEPA), a toolkit for the Convention on.

IUCN. (2001). Biodiversity IN Development Strategic Approach for Integrating Biodiversity in Development Cooperation: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK for the European Commission.

Kubiszewski, I., Costanza, R., Dorji, L., Thoennes, P., & Tshering, K. (2013). An initial estimate of the value of ecosystem services in Bhutan. Ecosystem Services, 3, e11-e21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.11.004

Lindsay. C, S., & Jouni, P. (2013). Participation in environmental conservation and protected area management in Romania: A review of three case studies. Environmental Conservation, 40(2), 138-146. doi:10.1017/S0376892913000039

Mace, G. M., Norris, K., & Fitter, A. H. (2012). Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multilayered relationship. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27(1), 19-26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006

Nyaupane, G. P., & Poudel, S. (2011). Linkages among biodiversity, livelihood, and tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(4), 1344-1366. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.03.006

Plieninger, T., Bieling, C., Fagerholm, N., Byg, A., Hartel, T., Hurley, P., . . . Huntsinger, L. (2015). The role of cultural ecosystem services in landscape management and planning. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 28-33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.02.006

Reid, A. J., Andrew, K.Carlson, Creed, I. F., Eliason, E. J., Gell, P. A., Johnson, P. T. J., . . . Cooke, S. J. (2018). Emerging threats and persistent conservationchallenges for freshwater biodiversity. Biological Reviews, 94(2019), 849 – 873. doi:10.1111/brv.12480

Renner, I., Emerton, L., & Kosmus, M. (2018). Integrating ecosystem services into development planning a stepwise approach for practitioners (A. v. Bertrab & L. Emerton Eds.). Bonn and Eschborn, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH.

Schirpke, U., Scolozzi, R., Da Re, R., Masiero, M., Pellegrino, D., & Marino, D. (2018). Recreational ecosystem services in protected areas: A survey of visitors to Natura 2000 sites in Italy. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 21, 39-50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2018.01.003

Schultz, M. (2016). Social-ecological assessments–examples of processes, tools, indicators, and metrics. swed: Stockholm Resilience Center.

Spash, C. L., Urama, K., Burton, R., Kenyon, W., Shannon, P., & Hill, G. (2009). Motives behind willingness to pay for improving biodiversity in a water ecosystem: Economics, ethics, and social psychology. Ecological Economics, 68(4), 955-964. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.013

Sterling, E. J., Betley, E., Sigouin, A., Gomez, A., Toomey, A., Cullman, G., . . . Porzecanski, A. L. (2017). Assessing the evidence for stakeholder engagement in biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 209, 159-171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.008

Villamor, G. B., Palomo, I., Santiago, C. A. L., Oteros-Rozas, E., & Hill, J. (2014). Assessing stakeholders' perceptions and values towards social-ecological systems using participatory methods. Ecological Processes, 3(1), 22. doi:10.1186/s13717-014-0022-9

Yager, G. O., Alarape, A. A., Enogela, O. M., & Tyowua, B. T. (2018). Biodiversity conservation problems and their implication on rangeland and ecotourism management in Gashaka-gumti national park, nigeria. Research in Forestry, Wildlife & Environment, 10(1), 119-129.

Yao, R. T., Scarpa, R., Turner, J. A., Barnard, T. D., Rose, J. M., Palma, J. H. N., & Harrison, D. R. (2014). Valuing biodiversity enhancement in New Zealand's planted forests: Socioeconomic and spatial determinants of willingness-to-pay. Ecological Economics, 98, 90-101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.009.