Assessing the attitude of experts and managers of natural resources and watershed management offices of Golestan province towards legal aspects of flood management

Document Type : Research Article

Author

Associate Professor of Agricultural Extension and Education, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

Abstract

Legal issues have special importance in flood management. The present study has investigated the most important legal issues related to floods through descriptive survey research. The study population included employees with expert positions in legal offices and heads of county natural resources offices in all counties of Golestan province who were surveyed by census method. The data collection tool was a researcher-made questionnaire whose validity was confirmed by the legal experts. SPSS18 software was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics and also Sign and Wilcoxon tests were used. The results showed the effectiveness of the current legal system in preventing floods, the influence of legal sentences regarding river and stream privacy, the power of legal units to litigate violations on the floodplain of rivers and streams, as well as the effectiveness of the current structure of the legal units of the natural resources offices to deal with the causes of floods, are at a moderate level. The most important legal weakness in flood management is related to monitoring the implementation of laws. According to the respondents, non-compliance with the rules and regulations of natural resources has played a strong role in the recent floods. Respondents also believed that the degree of overlap of duties between the custodians of rivers and streams and also disagreement among the custodians regarding the floodplain area of rivers and streams is considerable. The most important solutions to reform the legal system to improve flood management include imposing severe penalties for encroaching on the floodplain area of rivers and streams and giving priority to litigation of natural resource cases. According to the results, practical suggestions and recommendations have been presented to improve flood management.

Keywords

Main Subjects


References (in Persian)
Azizi, E.; Mostafazadeh, R.; Hazbavi, Z.; Esmali-Ouri, A., & Mirzaei, S. (2021). Introducing the flood vulnerability index (FVI) as a flood crisis management tool. Disaster Prevention and Management Knowledge, 11(2): 158-165. [In Persian]
Badini, H. (2005). The Philosophy of Civil Responsibility. Tehran: Publishing Joint Stock Company. 674 Pages [In Persian]
Esmailzadeh, S. (2010). Using international experiences in urban flood management and reducing its risks, First National Conference on Urban Flood Management, 1-2 August, Tehran. [In Persian]
Faghannejad, S., & Noori, M. (2012). Civil right in urgency situation: A comparative study in Iran, France & U.S.A Law. Journal of Emergency Management, 1(1): 69-81. [In Persian]
Jahani, R. (1397). The flood of Azerbaijan: Lessons to be learned. Symbol of Golestan, 43: 18-21. [In Persian]
Javaherian, F. (1398). The possibility of construction in the dry stream area is a misconception. Construction Magazine, 97: 28. [In Persian]
Manifar, H. (1398). Construction in river areas has economic roots. Construction Magazine, 97: 37. [In Persian]
Mirzaei, S., & Sadoddin, A. (2019). Comprehensive flood financial losses assessment framework (direct, indirect, tangible, and intangible): Flood incident on 17 April 2016, Nodeh Khandooz, the Gorganrood River Basin, Iran. Disaster Prevention and Management Knowledge, 9(4): 383-392. [In Persian]
Moayeri, M., & Entezari, M. (2008). Floods and review flood in the province of Esfahan. Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning, 3(6): 110-124. [In Persian]
Moeinian, A.; Rahimi, M.M.; Ahmadi, F., & Peyvandi, R. (1398). A study of natural disasters from the perspective of international law, A case study of Iran. New Attitudes in Human Geography, 12 (1): 457-475. [In Persian]
Naimi, N. (1398). Revision in implementation is more important than changing national building regulations. Construction Magazine, 97: 34. [In Persian]
Rezapour, E. (2010). A study of the legal aspects of urban flood management, The First National Conference on Urban Flood Management, 1-2 August, Tehran. [In Persian]
Seifzadeh, S.M. (1398). Neglecting the expertise of urban planners, the cause of flood disasters. Construction Magazine, 97: 36. [In Persian]
Talib-Bidokhti, N. (1398). Flood lessons 1398. Water and Wastewater Science Engineering, 4 (2): 3-2. [In Persian]
Zamani, B., & Hesari, N. (2010). Study of Tabriz urban flood management and possible damages due to land grabbing in the area of rivers and waterways of the city, The First National Conference on Urban Flood Management, 1-2 August, Tehran. [In Persian]
 
References (in English)
Alipour, A., Ahmadalipour, A., & Moradkhani, H. (2020). Assessing flash flood hazard and damages in the southeast United States. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 13(2):e12605. DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12605.
Almoradie, A., de Brito, M.M, Evers, M., Bossa, A., Lumor, M., Norman, C., Yacouba, Y., & Hounkpe, J. (2020). Current flood risk management practices in Ghana: Gaps and opportunities for improving resilience. Journal of Flood Risk Management, Online version of Record before inclusion in an issue, e12664.
Batler, C., & Pidgeon, N. (2011). From ‘flood defense’ to ‘flood risk management: Exploring governance, responsibility, and blame. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29: 533-547.
Cirillo, G., & Albrecht, E. (2015). The importance of law in flood risk management. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 197: 91-102.
Emami, S.H. (2006). Civil Rights. Tehran: Islamiyah Publications.
European Union. (2007). Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks. Official Journal of the European Union, L 288, 27–34. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX: 32007L0060&from=EN
European Union. (2013). Guidance for Reporting Under the Floods Directive (2007/60/EC) (Guidance Document No.29). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Faulkner, D., Warren, S., Spencer, P., & Sharkey, P. (2020). Can we still predict the future from the past? Implementing non-stationary flood frequency analysis in the UK. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 13(1):e12582. DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12582.
Hashemi, S.M. (2007). The Constitutional Law of the Islamic Republic of Iran (Vol.2). Tehran: Magazine Publication.
Priest, S. (2019). Shared roles and responsibilities in flood risk management. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 12(1): 1-2.
Raška, P., Warachowska, W., Slavíková, L., & Aubrechtová, T. (2020). Expectations, disappointments, and individual responses: Imbalances in multilevel flood risk governance revealed by the public survey. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 13(3): e12615. DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12615.
Rieu-Clarke, A.S. (2008). A survey of international law relating to flood management: Existing practices and prospects. Natural Resources Journal, 48(3): 649-677.
Waite, T.D., Chaintarli, K., Beck, C.R., Bone, A., Amlôt, R., Kovats, S., Reacher, M., Armstrong, B., Leonardi, G., Rubin. G.J., & Oliver, I. (2017). The English national cohort study of flooding and health: Cross-sectional analysis of mental health outcomes at year one. BMC Public Health, 17(1): 1-9.
Wells, J., Labadz, J.C., Smith, A., & Islam, M.M. (2020). Barriers to the uptake and implementation of natural flood management: A social‐ecological analysis. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 3(S1): e12561. DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12561.
Whitfield, P.H. (2012). Floods in future climates: A review. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 5(4): 336-365.
World Meteorological Organisation. (2009). Integrated Flood Management: Concept Paper (WMO-No.1047). Geneva: WMO.
  • Receive Date: 06 November 2020
  • Revise Date: 11 October 2021
  • Accept Date: 31 October 2021
  • First Publish Date: 31 October 2021
  • Publish Date: 23 September 2022