Economic Assessment of Environmental Damages Caused by Drying up of Hamoon Wetland in Sistan Region

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Agricultural Economics, Payam Noor University (PNU)

2 Associate Professor of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan

3 Professor of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan

Abstract

Wetlands play an important role in the prosperity of society in developing countries through the provision of goods and services that are used directly or indirectly, and therefore they are valuable. In this article, the value of carbon sequestration, oxygen production, water conservation and soil conservation were estimated to assess the economic losses caused by drought. the information needed to estimate the value of the production and regulation functions were obtained from Environmental protection organizations, The Forest Service, Rangeland and Watershed and previous studies, in the year of 2015. The production and regulation functions were estimated by using the market valuation method, alternative cost and shadow price.
The results show that the functions of regulating gas (carbon absorption and oxygen production) are 86920, Conserving soil and water conservation is 174004/31, 1629163/63 $. and the total value of the regulatory functions of Hamoon wetland is 165/071 billion. Estimated values for Hamoon wetland ecosystems have two major applications: first, in cost-benefit analysis, gaining economic support for the protection of Hamoon wetland and can be used to determine the number of damages and destruction of wetlands caused by drought. Second, the estimated value can be used in the production of the gross domestic product.

Keywords


References (in Persian)
Amirnejhad, H, (2007), Determining the Preservation and Recreational Values of Forest Park of Si Sangan Noshahr using the willingness to pay individuals. Journal of research and instruction. 72: 15-24.[In Persian]
Amirnejhad, H, (2011), Estimation of the Preservation Value of Environmental Resources. Case Study: Miankaleh International Wetland. Ecological Quarterly, 53: 89-98. [In Persian]
Ahmadi, H. (2000), Applied Geomorphology. Tehran University Press, Second Edition. Vol 1. [In Persian]
Panahi, M. (2006), Economic valuation of Caspian forests: Case studies in three forest wood and woodland areas of Mazandaran, Kheyroud and Gilan wood and paper. PhD dissertation, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran. [In Persian]
Dehghanian, S. (2002), Economics of Natural Resources, Environment and Policies Compilation: A Cola, Ferdowsi University Press, Mashhad, p 463. [In Persian]
Dehnavi, J. (2011), Presentation and application of spatial valuation model of wetland ecosystem services using GIS. Case study: Wetlands of the old district of Nowshahr. PhD thesis, Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran. [In Persian]
Abbasifar, A. (2008), Financial and Economic Evaluation of Kheiroudkenar Forestry Forestry Project with Emphasis on Environmental Benefits. Case Study: Nemekhaneh Branch. Master thesis, Department of Economic Economics, University of Tehran. [In Persian]
Alizadeh, A. (2007), Principles of Applied Hydrology. Astan Quds Razavi Publishing House, Twentieth Edition. [In Persian]
Koopahi, M. (2002), Principles of Agricultural Economics. Eighth edition, Tehran University Press. [In Persian]
Mobarghaei, N. (2008), Presenting and Using the Spatial Assessment Model of Forest Ecosystem Services Using the Geographic Information System Case Study: Kheyroud Forests near Noshahr. PhD thesis, Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran. [In Persian]
Molaei M. (2009), Economic valuation of natural resources by conditional valuation method. Journal of Economic Research, No. 27. [In Persian]
References (in English)
Bateman, I. (1991). Placing Money Values on the Unpriced Benefits of Forest. Quarterly Journal of Forestry. 85(3), 152-165.
FAO, (Food and Agriculture Organization). (2006). Global Forest Resource Assessment, Progress towards Sustainable Forest Management. FAO Forestry Paper 147.
Hawksworth, D. Kalin-Arroyo, M. (1995). Magnitude and Distribution of Biodiversity, in V. Heywood (ed). Global Biodiversity Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp 107-192.
Hargreaves, K. Milne, R (2003). Carbon Balance of Afforested Peatland in Scotland. Journal of Forestry. 75(3), 299-318.
Johansson, P.O. Kristrom H. (1989). Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 71: 1055-1056.
Li, J. Ren Z. (2006). Ecosystem Services and Their Values: A Case Study in the Qinba Mountains of China. Ecological Research. 21: 597-604.
Mooney, H. Lubchenco, D. (2003). Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Basic Principles, in V.Heywood (ed), Global Biodiversity Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 275-325.
Pearce, D.W. Pearce, C.J.T. (2001). The Value of Forest Ecosystem. A Report to The Secretariat Convention on Biological Diversity. Harvester Wheatsheaf Publishing.
Tisdell, C.A. (2005). Economics of Environmental Conservation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Second Edition.
  • Receive Date: 08 October 2017
  • Revise Date: 03 December 2017
  • Accept Date: 31 January 2018
  • First Publish Date: 21 March 2019
  • Publish Date: 21 March 2019